Why is LinkedIn (Microsoft) Allowed to Dominate (Monopolize) the Corporate H/R Landscape?
If Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, Peter Thiel, etc. don’t give you a (In-Q-Tel / DARPA / CIA / DoD / Epstein) clue, I don’t know what will…
LinkedIn (essentially Bill Gates / Microsoft since 2016) is just another part of the "asymmetrical, total warfare" apparatus of the globalists. To not recognize this is woefully naïve. Silicon Valley has become the new, defacto, MIC / Military Industrial Complex and many are unaware this “professional social network” and enterprise / corporate sales platform is part of the various means to surveil and influence (“nudge”) huge swaths of the international “professional” population – and especially to propagate and control certain public narrative(s). This is propaganda on steroids and “social engineering at scale.” Further weaponization against a mostly unsuspecting populace - “weapons of mass distraction (and indoctrination)” - much like I write about here. What’s more, as we’ve seen with the COVID operation, LinkedIn (like so many others in social media) was weaponized to cancel, deplatform, censor, marginalize (shadow ban), etc. any dissenting opinions (or facts) that run counter to the preferred globalist narratives of the Biotech Industrial Complex. That LinkedIn and so many others hide behind voluminous, opaque “terms and conditions” and enforce dubious “community standards” are just clever ways in which these behemoths thwart the 1st Amendment – as proxies (stand-ins) to the U.S. Government. The “Censorship Industrial Complex” (H/T
). This mostly unwritten “P3” (Public Private Partnership) is yet another example of “privatized government” to – in effect – operate in an extra-judicial (extra-Constitutional) capacity. Outside the law. Untouchable.We've witnessed the ascendancy of the "Laptop Class" (and “Zoom Privilege”) these last several years – brought-into stark focus with the lockdowns instituted worldwide in the early days of the scamdemic, which gave rise to this “professional remote-work class.” This class (the PMC or Professional Managerial Class) is predominantly comprised of the neoliberal urban professionals / corporate office and institution workers whose (now apparent) narcissistic modus operandi is to congregate (and control / dominate) on these social media platforms to essentially control discourse. To force their views and ideology onto everyone else – regardless of the troublesome facts that run contrary to their preferred (neoliberal globalist) narratives. And if you’re one who challenges the status quo, particularly with well-crafted analyses based upon significant research / rigorous due diligence, you are quickly rendered a pariah and persona non grata (cancelled). While this may seem relatively harmless and a trivial inconvenience, the issue is that LinkedIn, essentially founded (financed) by the “PayPal Mafia” (e.g. Peter Thiel of Facebook, Paypal, and Palantir fame) and owned and run by founder Reid Hoffman and acquirer Bill Gates (Microsoft) – both of whom have been documented passengers on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” – has been (artificially?) promoted to monopoly status in the world of corporate (Fortune 1000) recruiting and human resources. And nobody bats an eye? The new, contemporary “robber barons” need to be checked.
This LinkedIn monopoly status means that if you do not have a LinkedIn profile, you are considered a “professional curiosity” (“suspect”) if not an outright liability by the corporate recruiters and H/R representatives – especially if you do digital related work. Companies by and large want their mid-level and senior “talent” to have “brand equity” and “professional network cachet,” and in the current corporate world, that is most easily (and designed) displayed by a well-cultivated LinkedIn network and presence – today’s version of the old skool, well curated “Rolodex.” That companies want to extend their brand (reach, frequency, SME / subject matter expertise, “virtue,” “altruism,” etc.) by way of employee brand / company influencers is now just SOP (standard operating procedure) in the virtue signaling and shameless (narcissistic) self-promotion world. This is as important as the sales enablement / sales opportunities afforded by tapping a senior employee’s personal (professional) network on behalf of the company for sales / partnerships opportunities and growth via recruiting / referrals. Companies have learned over the last decade that earned media, by way of their employees, is extremely valuable. If you don’t bring this value to the table as a senior employee, then you may very well be considered “less than” someone who does – regardless of your seniority, merit, skills, expertise, and experiences. This has created very real-world issues in terms of material (income) damages – potential or otherwise – when LinkedIn decides to deplatform you. Losing a well cultivated professional network, access to the business development resources / integrations (e.g. LinkedIn Sales Navigator), the associated content (posts and articles), and perhaps the best network reach and frequency of any of the social networks prior to CONVID has real-world repercussions. Repercussions that I am currently dealing with in my (thus far fruitless) job search. Another troubling aspect of my cancellation / deplatforming is that many of the H/R and recruiting platforms / portals almost all REQUIRE (when is “optional” not really optional?) a LinkedIn profile URL. That this is considered “table stakes” in a corporate, professional job search – senior level or otherwise – is extremely concerning. How did LinkedIn become so ubiquitous (and almost universally required) in the corporate job search space?
Back when the scamdemic began, it was readily apparent that “things were amiss.” As one who had witnessed 9/11 and came to distrust any of the official narratives associated with that fateful day – you might say that my “bullshit detector” began emphatically blaring starting late March 2020. While the media was incessantly churning-out “fear porn,” certain promoted narratives were extremely problematic – especially within the ranks of the “elite” scientists of the world. Some either fell into (Biotech Industrial Complex) lockstep with the Neil (“Mad Cow”) Ferguson, Christian Drosten, Victor Corman (of the infamous Corman-Drosten paper and it’s famous challenge in the Corman-Drosten Review), Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, the WHO, CDC, NIH, NIAID, etc. etc. etc. – while others challenged what was clearly “shoddy (virology) science,” statistical manipulation, and egregious fear mongering. Never was the well-known and published (and never disputed) risk stratification challenged, but the proverbial train had been FORCEFULLY PUSHED out of the station.
One-by-one I witnessed (until it finally became my turn) brilliant, reasonable, and articulate contemporaries on LinkedIn “disappear,” only to find out later they had been deplatformed for challenging the incessant propaganda – under the aegis of being in violation of the LinkedIn “professional community standards.” What quickly became apparent was that there was only one allowed perspective, one acceptable narrative, and that was whatever LinkedIn arbitrarily determined – regardless of the increasingly conflicting information being disseminated. The ever-shifting landscape when it came to the scamdemic resulted in a much more sinister policy than that of simply deplatforming those whom shared “misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation” relating to COVID-19. It became a policy of deplatforming those who QUESTIONED THINGS IN GENERAL. A widespread quashing of dissent – regardless of subject veracity. That was the only way LinkedIn (and the other platforms) could “stay ahead” of the ever shifting propaganda narratives – to outright cancel, censor or otherwise shadow ban almost any form of dissent. COVID-19 was just the “opener” of this fascist can of worms. The Agenda 21 / 2030 can of worms.
I choose to speak out regarding what amounts to egregious crimes by a class of apparent “untouchables.” These billionaires, their behemoth software companies, and their platforms should NOT be able to hide behind “terms and conditions” and “community standards” simply because of the widely promoted falsehood of “a private company can do what it wants.” As these companies ARE the Web for most people (the big platforms and “walled gardens” are most peoples’ experience of the Web) – and they are now integrated with many other aspects of the wider WWW / digital experience – this makes these platforms inherently part of the “digital town square” and part of the very digital infrastructure of modern life. Like a service or utility. Once a company has ascended to the stature whereby your livelihood and Constitutional rights / freedoms can be severely impacted – at their whim – they should no longer be considered “private companies” and allowed those related protections. Once a platform has reached (and surpassed) a certain threshold of users, their potential capabilities in social engineering becomes extremely problematic. And we KNOW that these technocrat billionaires and their sycophants are actively involved in social engineering - Bill Gates being the most glaring example. While I don’t have the answers – these billionaires and their companies act with impunity – like their own nation states. This must end. Somehow. Some way. Or we are doomed to a technocratic, fascist dystopia.
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Temet Nosce. Amor Fati. Memento Mori.
Praise Be To Hanuman
The Breath, Great Servant, and Hammer of R-A-M-A and S-I-T-A
EPILOGUE:
On a lark (and a moment of fury), I create a Farcebook Group, “Class Action Lawsuit Exploration Against LinkedIn” just to “collect / centralize” the artifacts of my experience getting deplatformed. Incidentally, I was deplatformed from Twitter (now “X”) not long afterward – for challenging Pfizer directly regarding their experimental, liability free, EUA (emergency use authorization) facilitated product(s). Here are some of the artifacts I’ve posted in that group. Feel free to join and tell your own story – or refer to an attorney or law firm that may be interested in taking-up this case!
“This Group is to "collect" all those whom have been "victimized" (e.g. "deplatformed") by LinkedIn and / or victimized by LinkedIn's monopolistic practices and to perhaps move-forward in retaining appropriate counsel for a potential Class Action Lawsuit. If you have been - or know someone who has been "deplatformed" or otherwise censored by LinkedIn over the last few years - and then were (incessantly) asked for your LinkedIn Profile during a subsequent job search or used LinkedIn as a "Lead Generation" solution - and can no longer do this - then join this group as we explore a potential class action lawsuit against LinkedIn for real-world damages (e.g. harm to income / livelihood, potential or future harm to income / livelihood)”
ADDITIONAL - artifacts that support the (my) claim that LinkedIn is artificially promoted (and widely integrated) as the corporate H/R and recruiting “gatekeeper” platform:
American companies Ghost Posting job openings (43% !!!) to make their numbers look better and "motivate" existing employees. Fake job market, fake economy, fake media, fake, fake, fake... https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/why-nearly-half-of-us-online-job-postings-are-fake-5661146
This article / interview / book launch bears mentioning again: https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/dangers-ai-hiring-firing-employees-focus-book/story?id=108890705